Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Revealed August 2009
  • Alternative Name is ST550
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL225, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TL225 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was brought out 5 years earlier than the TL225 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-300 matches up versus the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung TL225

 E-300 TL225 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Olympus E-300

 TL225 E-300 
RevealedAugust 2009January 2005More recent by 55 months
Display dimension3.5"1.8"Larger display (+1.7")
Display resolution1152k134kCrisper display (+1018k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL225

 E-300 TL225 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL225 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 compared to the TL225.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and TL225 is 67 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and TL225.

As you can see, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung TL225 will result in extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography info
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
21
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports focus by touch
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than others in class (187 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8 megapixels)
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Samsung TL225 Travel photography features
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution (8 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
59
supports focus by touch
flash built-in
rather wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than others in class (187 grams)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse recording
37
rather wide (27mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Samsung TL225
9
no video recording
29
rather wide (27mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than others in class (187g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung TL225
 Olympus E-300Samsung TL225
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-300 Samsung TL225
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 ST550
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-08-13
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8" 3.5"
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 1,152 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 187g (0.41 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $800 $488