Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung WB30F, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and WB30F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

The E-400 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-400 matches up vs the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Samsung WB30F

 E-400 WB30F 
Focus manually Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus E-400

 WB30F E-400 
LaunchedJanuary 2013September 2006More recent by 76 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Samsung WB30F

 E-400 WB30F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 versus Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-400 compared to the WB30F.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and WB30F is 77 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and WB30F.

All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-400 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB30F will give you more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography details
46
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual mode not possible
low MP (10MP)
35
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Street photography highlights
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
64
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (128g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Samsung WB30F
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
45
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competitors (128g)
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Landscape photography camera
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
43
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging info
Samsung WB30F Vlogging info
9
lack of video recording
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (128 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus E-400 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Samsung WB30F
 Olympus E-400Samsung WB30F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-400 Samsung WB30F
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2006-09-14 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 128 gr (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $599 $180