Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
77 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed June 2007
- Other Name is EVOLT E-410
- Replaced the Olympus E-400
- New Model is Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Released February 2012
- Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-410 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-410 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the E-410 (Four Thirds) and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-410 was revealed 5 years prior to the DP1 Merrill which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-410 matches up against the DP1 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-410 & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-410 Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| E-410 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.5" | " | Larger display (+2.5") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus E-410
| DP1 Merrill | E-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | June 2007 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 215k | Crisper display (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-410 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| E-410 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-410 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus E-410 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-410 versus the DP1 Merrill.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-410 and DP1 Merrill is 77 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The picture here should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-410 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-410 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will provide you with more detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-410 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-410 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus E-410 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus E-410 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-410 | - |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2007-06-14 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | () |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 215k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 330 gr (0.73 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.0 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 494 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | - | $1,250 |