Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched June 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-420 versus Ricoh G900, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-420 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) and the E-420 (Four Thirds) and G900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-420 was launched 10 years prior to the G900 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-420 grades against the G900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 and Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-420 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh G900
E-420 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus E-420
G900 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | June 2008 | Newer by 117 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh G900
E-420 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-420 features outer measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh G900 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus E-420 versus Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-420 against the G900.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-420 and G900 is 77 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by seeing specs. The pic below should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-420 and G900.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-420 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh G900 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-420 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-420 | Ricoh G900 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Launched | 2008-06-23 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 340 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $999 | $752 |