Clicky

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-420 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-410
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Newer Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very comparable but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-420 was manufactured 13 months prior to the GR Digital III making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-420 scores versus the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-420 GR Digital III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-420

 GR Digital III E-420 
ReleasedJuly 2009June 2008More recent by 13 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-420 GR Digital III 
Manual focus More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-420 comes with external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-420 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-420 compared to the GR Digital III.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-420 and GR Digital III is 77 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-420 and GR Digital III.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-420 has got the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-420 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-420 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography details
57
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
40
you can focus manually
saves RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-420 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography advice
64
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426g)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
55
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-420 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
39
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
bad battery (500 per charge)
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-420 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography information
53
lighter than competition in class (426g)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery (500 CIPA)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
63
flash built-in
good max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-420 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography advice
47
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
bad battery (500 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
45
you can focus manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3 inch)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-420 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
9
no video
25
good max aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-420 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-420 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus E-420Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-420 Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2008-06-23 2009-07-27
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 pounds) 208 grams (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 527 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $999 $399