Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed March 2009
- Succeeded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and WG-50 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-450 was released 9 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-450 scores against the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Ricoh WG-50
E-450 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus E-450
WG-50 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | March 2009 | Fresher by 99 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Ricoh WG-50
E-450 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-450 features exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-450 and the WG-50.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-450 and WG-50 is 77 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and WG-50.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-450 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-50 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-450 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-450 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-03-31 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $138 | $280 |