Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-500
- Successor is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ10W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-500 (8MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-500 (Four Thirds) and HZ10W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-500 was released 4 years prior to the HZ10W and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-500 scores vs the HZ10W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 & Samsung HZ10W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-500 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung HZ10W
| E-500 | HZ10W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus E-500
| HZ10W | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2009 | October 2005 | More recent by 43 months | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ10W
| E-500 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-500 comes with outside dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-500 and Samsung HZ10W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 compared to the HZ10W.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and HZ10W is 70 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and HZ10W.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung HZ10W will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-500 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-500 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus E-500 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-500 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-500 | WB500 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2005-10-21 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 215k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $600 | $300 |