Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and WB350F (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The E-500 was released 9 years earlier than the WB350F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-500 scores vs the WB350F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Samsung WB350F

 E-500 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus E-500

 WB350F E-500 
IntroducedJanuary 2014October 2005More recent by 100 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k215kSharper display (+245k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Samsung WB350F

 E-500 WB350F 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-500 against the WB350F.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and WB350F is 70 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-500 and WB350F.

As you can see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-500 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung WB350F will result in more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-500 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography information
49
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
40
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography advice
Samsung WB350F Street photography advice
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (479g)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
50
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB350F Travel photography advice
52
lighter than average in class (479 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition (276 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography factors
43
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Timelapse mode
50
focusing manually
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB350F Vlogging factors
9
no video
34
really wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (276g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Olympus E-500 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus E-500Samsung WB350F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-500 Samsung WB350F
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-500 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-10-21 2014-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 215k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 gr (1.06 lb) 276 gr (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at release $600 $260