Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Successor is Olympus E-510
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-500 was brought out 11 years before the Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-500 grades vs the Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Sigma Quattro

 E-500 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-500

 Quattro E-500 
LaunchedFebruary 2016October 2005More modern by 125 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1620k215kClearer screen (+1405k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Sigma Quattro

 E-500 Quattro 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-500 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-500 versus the Quattro.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-500 and Quattro is 70 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-500 and Quattro.

As you can see, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-500 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will provide you with greater detail having its extra 21 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-500 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
49
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
81
you can focus manually
high megapixels (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-500
Street photography with Sigma Quattro
57
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average (479 grams)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (625g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography factors
Sigma Quattro Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
70
high megapixels (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect auto focus
max fps low (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-500 Travel photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
52
lighter than average (479g)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (8MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
55
environment sealing
high megapixels (29 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (625 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
high megapixels (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging factors
Sigma Quattro Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
22
offers face detect focus
does not feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video ( pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
heavier than competition (625 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-500 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Sigma Quattro
 Olympus E-500Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus E-500 Sigma sd Quattro
Also referred to as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2005-10-21 2016-02-23
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 29 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Total lenses 45 76
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Max video resolution None -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 lb) 625g (1.38 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $600 $738