Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-25 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe FE-25 was announced 19 months earlier than the CX4 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the FE-25 scores against the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-25 & Ricoh CX4. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh CX4
| FE-25 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus FE-25
| CX4 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 19 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 112k | Clearer display (+808k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX4
| FE-25 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 has physical dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 vs the CX4.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and CX4 is 98 and 92 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and CX4.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos but you should always take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged FE-25 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $15 | $211 |