Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FE-4000 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe FE-4000 was brought out 6 months later than the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the FE-4000 scores versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung SL202
| FE-4000 | SL202 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus FE-4000
| SL202 | FE-4000 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung SL202
| FE-4000 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-4000 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-4000 compared to the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4000 and SL202 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-4000 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus FE-4000 to provide you with extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | X-925 | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $130 | $140 |
