Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is X-925
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-4000 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe FE-4000 was revealed 5 years before the WB35F which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-4000 scores vs the WB35F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB35F. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4000 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Samsung WB35F
FE-4000 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus FE-4000
WB35F | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 54 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4000 and Samsung WB35F
FE-4000 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4000 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4000 vs the WB35F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-4000 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4000 and WB35F.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged FE-4000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus FE-4000 | Samsung WB35F |
Also called | X-925 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 136 gr (0.30 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $130 | $130 |