Clicky

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30
Olympus FE-4030 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

In this article, we are matching up the Olympus FE-4030 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The FE-4030 was announced 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FE-4030 grades versus the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FE-4030 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus FE-4030

 DP2 Quattro FE-4030 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2010More modern by 49 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 FE-4030 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-4030 enjoys outside dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Examine the Olympus FE-4030 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the FE-4030 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-4030 and DP2 Quattro is 95 and 70 respectively.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing specs. The image here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-4030 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FE-4030 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will show more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-4030
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
77
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-4030
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Sports photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography details
35
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
48
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
65
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
53
good MP (20MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4030
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
decently wide (26mm)
megapixel count good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
59
manual focus
screen is a good size (3")
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-4030 Vlogging info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging info
26
decently wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
9
no video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-4030 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-4030 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus FE-4030Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus FE-4030 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-07 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-105mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 4cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 146g (0.32 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal -
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $130 $931