Clicky

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus FE-5020 front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
56
Features
33
Overall
46

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-935
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Refreshed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is relatively similar but the FE-5020 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The FE-5020 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the DP2 Merrill which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the FE-5020 matches up versus the DP2 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 FE-5020 DP2 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus FE-5020

 DP2 Merrill FE-5020 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012July 2009Newer by 31 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 FE-5020 DP2 Merrill 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-5020 comes with outer dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the FE-5020 and the DP2 Merrill.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-5020 and DP2 Merrill is 95 and 83 respectively.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-5020 and DP2 Merrill.

Clearly, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The FE-5020 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will offer you extra detail having an extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-5020
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Merrill
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
you can focus manually
MP count decent (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-5020
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Merrill
60
weather proofing
lighter than competitors (137g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
65
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Sports photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Sports photography factors
24
weather proofing
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/500s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
44
MP count decent (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (50mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus FE-5020
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Merrill
65
lighter than competitors (137g)
weather proofing
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
54
MP count decent (15MP)
no Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography details
Sigma DP2 Merrill Landscape photography details
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
55
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
MP count decent (15MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (50mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-5020 Vlogging info
Sigma DP2 Merrill Vlogging info
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
lighter than competitors (137 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
22
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus FE-5020 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-5020 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Olympus FE-5020Sigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus FE-5020 Sigma DP2 Merrill
Also referred to as X-935 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-22 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4704 x 3136
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-120mm (5.0x) 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.8 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs -
Max shutter speed 1/500 secs -
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.10 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640x480
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 137 gr (0.30 lb) 330 gr (0.73 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD-Picture Card, microSD -
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $160 $931