Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Announced August 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Ricoh GR II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 IV was launched 5 years after the GR II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 IV matches up versus the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Ricoh GR II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Ricoh GR II
| E-M10 IV | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2020 | June 2015 | More modern by 63 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| GR II | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+190k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh GR II
| E-M10 IV | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Ricoh GR II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the GR II.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and GR II is 81 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and GR II.
Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh GR II |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2020-08-04 | 2015-06-17 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | GR Engine V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lb) | 251 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | 320 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $699 | $599 |