Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
55
Overall
56

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Announced August 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Announced June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Ricoh GR II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 IV was launched 5 years after the GR II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M10 IV matches up versus the GR II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Ricoh GR II

 E-M10 IV GR II 
AnnouncedAugust 2020June 2015More modern by 63 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 GR II E-M10 IV 
Screen resolution1230k1040kSharper screen (+190k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh GR II

 E-M10 IV GR II 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got physical dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Ricoh GR II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the GR II.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and GR II is 81 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and GR II.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 IV featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV should have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography features
77
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
74
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Street photography with Ricoh GR II
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
72
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
lacks phase detect autofocus
50
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
max fps very slow (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR II Travel photography highlights
84
has bluetooth
supports touch focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
67
lighter than others in class (251g)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography highlights
82
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
59
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inch)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR II Vlogging advice
78
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't have mic port
32
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others in class (251g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVRicoh GR II
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Ricoh GR II
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2020-08-04 2015-06-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII GR Engine V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus range - 10cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 300 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.7 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383 grams (0.84 lb) 251 grams (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life 360 shots 320 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $699 $599