Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 IV was released 10 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
| E-M10 IV | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2020 |  | August 2010 | Newer by 122 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
| E-M10 IV | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 IV and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 81 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you have seen, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2010-08-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 367 gr (0.81 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 440 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $699 | $147 |
