Clicky

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 was revealed 2 years after the GXR Mount A12 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 matches up versus the GXR Mount A12 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 E-M10 GXR Mount A12 
ReleasedMarch 2014August 2011Newer by 32 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1037k920kClearer display (+117k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-M10

 GXR Mount A12 E-M10 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 E-M10 GXR Mount A12 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 and the GXR Mount A12.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and GXR Mount A12 is 82 and 84 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and GXR Mount A12.

All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M10 will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
71
manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW formats
55
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Street photography factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography factors
77
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers touch focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
65
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Sports photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
39
great max shutter speed (1/9,000s)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Travel photography details
67
offers touch focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than competition in class (396g)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
60
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Landscape photography highlights
79
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
52
has manual focus
fast max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
33
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
26
fast max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Olympus OM-D E-M10Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2014-03-18 2011-08-05
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - ()
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/9000s
Continuous shutter rate 8.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO100) 9.60 m
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 396 gr (0.87 lb) 370 gr (0.82 lb)
Physical dimensions 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 884 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 330 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 DB-90
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $600 $349