Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Released August 2011
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 was revealed 2 years after the GXR Mount A12 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 matches up versus the GXR Mount A12 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | August 2011 | Newer by 32 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-M10
GXR Mount A12 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 offers exterior dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 and the GXR Mount A12.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 and GXR Mount A12 is 82 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and GXR Mount A12.
All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M10 will render extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-03-18 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | () |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/9000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396 gr (0.87 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 330 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $600 | $349 |