Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1X was brought out 5 years after the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1X scores vs the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-M1X | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | February 2014 | Newer by 61 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-M1X
WG-4 GPS | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-M1X | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size |
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X enjoys outside measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1X and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1X compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and WG-4 GPS is 54 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The pic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1X featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1X is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2019-01-24 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997 gr (2.20 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | 240 images |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Launch pricing | $2,999 | $210 |