Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Launched September 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M5 II was launched 4 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 II scores versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 E-M5 II GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
LaunchedFebruary 2015September 2010More recent by 54 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kClearer screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-M5 II

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 E-M5 II GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II features outer measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M5 II against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 80 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 II and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M5 II will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II will have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
72
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
58
focusing manually
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Street photography camera
82
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
includes touch focus
weather sealing
great high ISO (25,600)
70
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than others (140g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography advice
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography advice
65
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather sealing
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
32
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
fixed focal length (28mm)
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (320 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography details
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography details
74
weather sealing
includes touch focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
59
lighter than others (140g)
flash built-in
terrible battery life (320 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
74
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
48
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3 inches)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (320 shots)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Vlogging camera
82
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has external microphone support
28
provides face detect focusing
lighter than others (140 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone jack
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIRicoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2015-02-06 2010-09-21
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII GR Engine III
Sensor type MOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/3200s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash modes Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 gr (1.03 pounds) 140 gr (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photos 320 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $699 $566