Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Updated by Olympus E-M5 III
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-M5 II (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 II was released 4 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M5 II scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-M5 II GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedFebruary 2015March 2010More recent by 60 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-M5 II

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-M5 II GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-M5 II versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 II should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
72
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
36
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Street photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
82
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch focus
weather proof
great high ISO (25,600)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
65
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
terrible battery power (310 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
74
weather proof
supports touch focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery power (310 per charge)
60
lighter than competition in class (355g)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography highlights
74
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
terrible battery power (310 shots)
47
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging details
82
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
comes with mic support
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M5 II vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2015-02-06 2010-03-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 grams (1.03 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photographs 410 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $699 $349