Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Updated by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Announced August 2010
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M5 III was unveiled 9 years later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M5 III grades against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-M5 III | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | August 2010 | More recent by 112 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-M5 III
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-M5 III | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide more detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 367 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 440 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $1,199 | $147 |