Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Released October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Updated by OM System OM-5
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M5 III was revealed 9 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-M5 III GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedOctober 2019March 2010More recent by 117 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k920kSharper display (+120k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-M5 III

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-M5 III GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III has external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The visual below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M5 III will provide extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Portrait photography camera
77
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
36
you can focus manually
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
83
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment sealing
great ISO range (25,600)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (355g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
76
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
high fps (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
low battery pack (310 CIPA)
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography highlights
77
environment sealing
has bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
MP count good (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
low battery pack (310 per charge)
60
lighter than competition (355 grams)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography factors
77
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
low battery pack (310 shots)
47
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
84
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external mic support
28
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M5 III vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2019-10-17 2010-03-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 30.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.50 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 grams (0.91 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 shots 410 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $1,199 $349