Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M5 was introduced 2 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M5 scores vs the CX2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M5 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh CX2
E-M5 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | August 2009 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-M5
CX2 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 610k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh CX2
E-M5 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 provides outer measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 and the CX2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and CX2 is 81 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and CX2.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh CX2 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-04-30 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 610k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $799 | $341 |