Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M5 versus Sigma SD9, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 was unveiled 9 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 grades vs the SD9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Sigma SD9. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Sigma SD9
E-M5 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2012 | November 2002 | More recent by 115 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 610k | 130k | Crisper screen (+480k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-M5
SD9 | E-M5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Sigma SD9
E-M5 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 offers exterior measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 versus Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 compared to the SD9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and SD9 is 81 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M5 will deliver more detail having an extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2002-11-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 107 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 pounds) | 950g (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $3,001 |