Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Announced October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus E-P5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-P5 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very close but the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-P5 was introduced 4 months before the WG-4 GPS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-P5 scores against the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| E-P5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-P5
| WG-4 GPS | E-P5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| E-P5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2013 | February 2014 | Same generation | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P5 offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P5 against the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P5 and WG-4 GPS is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P5 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-P5 comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult.
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-10-03 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/320 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 420 grams (0.93 lbs) | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 895 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $389 | $210 |