Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Pentax WG-3 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
Pentax WG-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released July 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL2 versus Pentax WG-3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PL2 was revealed 3 years before the WG-3 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-PL2 scores versus the WG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Pentax WG-3

 E-PL2 WG-3 

Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus E-PL2

 WG-3 E-PL2 
ReleasedJuly 2013February 2011Newer by 29 months

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax WG-3

 E-PL2 WG-3 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 versus Pentax WG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL2 vs the WG-3.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and WG-3 is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specs. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and WG-3.

All in all, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-3 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography highlights
Pentax WG-3 Portrait photography highlights
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
41
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography information
Pentax WG-3 Street photography information
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography advice
Pentax WG-3 Sports photography advice
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (280 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography information
Pentax WG-3 Travel photography information
51
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (280 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
72
weather proof
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery power (240 per charge)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography factors
Pentax WG-3 Landscape photography factors
61
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (280 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
54
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery power (240 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging features
Pentax WG-3 Vlogging features
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
36
reasonably wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax WG-3
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Pentax WG-3
General Information
Make Olympus Pentax
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Pentax WG-3
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2011-02-11 2013-07-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362 gr (0.80 lb) 230 gr (0.51 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 images 240 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $0 $300