Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe E-PL2 was revealed 19 months after the GR Digital III which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL2 matches up versus the GR Digital III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
E-PL2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-PL2
GR Digital III | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
E-PL2 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL2 against the GR Digital III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and GR Digital III is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and GR Digital III.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL2 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger E-PL2 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 pounds) | 208 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $399 |