Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The E-PL2 was revealed 19 months after the GR Digital III which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL2 matches up versus the GR Digital III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-PL2 GR Digital III 
IntroducedFebruary 2011July 2009Newer by 19 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-PL2

 GR Digital III E-PL2 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-PL2 GR Digital III 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL2 against the GR Digital III.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and GR Digital III is 85 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and GR Digital III.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL2 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger E-PL2 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL2
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
40
manual focus
saves RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL2
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
55
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Sports photography camera
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery power (280 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
17
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low battery power (280 shots)
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
63
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography info
61
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery power (280 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
45
manual focus
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inches)
saves RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
no image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging features
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
25
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Ricoh GR Digital III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-02-11 2009-07-27
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 gr (0.80 pounds) 208 gr (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $399