Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL2 was introduced 11 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PL2 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL2 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | March 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL2
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL2 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 provides exterior dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 85 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL2 will deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PL2 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-02-11 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 410 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $0 | $349 |