Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Introduced March 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") provide different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PL2 was introduced 11 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PL2 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-PL2 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedFebruary 2011March 2010Fresher by 11 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL2

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC E-PL2 
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-PL2 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 provides exterior dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 85 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PL2 will deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PL2 should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography features
60
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
36
focusing manually
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low MP (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition (355 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography features
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery life (280 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
max fps low (2.0 fps)
low MP (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
not so great battery life (280 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
60
lighter than competition (355g)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
low MP (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography features
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery life (280 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
47
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focus
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
28
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (355g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2011-02-11 2010-03-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Truepic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362 grams (0.80 lbs) 355 grams (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photos 410 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $0 $349