Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
86 Imaging
54 Features
81 Overall
64
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL6
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Launched September 2010
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL7 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the E-PL7 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-PL7 was brought out 4 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-PL7 matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL7 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL7 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL7 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-PL7
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-PL7 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL7 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL7 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL7 has got physical dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL7 versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL7 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The picture below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL7 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL7 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-PL7 will render extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PL7 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL7 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-01 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 357 gr (0.79 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 873 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $566 |