Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
86 Imaging
55 Features
76 Overall
63
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-PL8 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe E-PL8 was unveiled 6 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-PL8 matches up against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL8 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL8 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | September 2010 | More modern by 73 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-PL8
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL8 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL8 has got outer measurements of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL8 versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 86 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL8 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL8 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL8 will provide greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL8 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL8 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 320 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $500 | $566 |