Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is very similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-PM2 was brought out 16 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-PM2 matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PM2 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 16 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PM2
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PM2 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PM2 against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 89 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The visual here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 includes the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF tougher. The younger E-PM2 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 550g (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $448 | $871 |