Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
48
Overall
39

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Introduced May 2013
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview

The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") use different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-PM2 was announced 2 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC

 E-PM2 GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC 
AnnouncedMay 2013August 2010Newer by 34 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-PM2

 GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC E-PM2 
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC

 E-PM2 GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 provides exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 89 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.

As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will render more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Portrait photography factors
71
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
40
manual focus
supports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography info
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Street photography info
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC as a Sports photography camera
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
no phase detect AF
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery pack (440 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Travel photography factors
66
comes with focus via touch
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
63
great battery pack (440 CIPA)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
74
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
52
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (440 CIPA)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC as a Vlogging camera
36
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
27
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2013-05-21 2010-08-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 4.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269 grams (0.59 lbs) 367 grams (0.81 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photos 440 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $448 $147