Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Announced August 2010
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PM2 was announced 2 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PM2 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | August 2010 | Newer by 34 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-PM2
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PM2 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 provides exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 89 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will render more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-PM2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 367 grams (0.81 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 440 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $448 | $147 |