Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SP-565UZ was unveiled around the same time to the SL202 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the SP-565UZ grades versus the SL202 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung SL202
| SP-565UZ | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| SL202 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung SL202
| SP-565UZ | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ features physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the SL202.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and SL202 is 72 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and SL202.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you can expect comparable quality of photographs although you may want to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $140 |
