Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Released April 2012
  • Previous Model is Sigma SD1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the SP-565UZ (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SP-565UZ was unveiled 4 years prior to the SD1 Merrill which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SP-565UZ grades against the SD1 Merrill with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SP-565UZ SD1 Merrill 

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 SD1 Merrill SP-565UZ 
ReleasedApril 2012January 2009Newer by 39 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Sigma SD1 Merrill

 SP-565UZ SD1 Merrill 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).

Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the SD1 Merrill.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and SD1 Merrill is 72 and 57 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and SD1 Merrill.

Clearly, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SP-565UZ having a smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide more detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
39
focusing manually
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
65
you can focus manually
MP count good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Street photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Street photography camera
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
33
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
61
MP count good (15MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
environment proofing
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
great reach (520mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
environment proofing
MP count good (15MP)
does not have Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
40
focusing manually
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
63
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count good (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SP-565UZ
Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
24
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
9
no video shooting
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Sigma SD1 Merrill
 Olympus SP-565UZSigma SD1 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Sigma SD1 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2009-01-15 2012-04-10
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 15MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4800 x 3200
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-4.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.64x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 grams (0.91 lb) 790 grams (1.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible)
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $400 $2,339