Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93
69 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Updated by Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Released April 2011
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung ST93, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is pretty close and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SP-800 UZ was revealed 14 months before the ST93 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the SP-800 UZ scores vs the ST93 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-800 UZ & Samsung ST93. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery & Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Samsung ST93
SP-800 UZ | ST93 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
ST93 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 14 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-800 UZ and Samsung ST93
SP-800 UZ | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-800 UZ features outside measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SP-800 UZ versus Samsung ST93 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SP-800 UZ against the ST93.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-800 UZ and ST93 is 69 and 97 respectively.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-800 UZ and ST93.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Samsung ST93 to render extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged SP-800 UZ will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-800 UZ vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus SP-800 UZ | Samsung ST93 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2011-04-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1000 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | () |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 12s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 455g (1.00 lbs) | 110g (0.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $270 | - |