Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 5010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus 5010 versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the 5010 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 5010 was introduced 5 months later than the CX2 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 5010 grades vs the CX2 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 5010 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 5010 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Ricoh CX2
| 5010 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus 5010
| CX2 | 5010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 5010 and Ricoh CX2
| 5010 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | August 2009 | Similar generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 5010 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Olympus 5010 versus Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the 5010 and the CX2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 5010 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by going over specifications. The graphic here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 5010 and CX2.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus 5010 to deliver more detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively.
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 5010 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 5010 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 5010 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Alternate name | mju 5010 | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lbs) | 185 gr (0.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $150 | $341 |