Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320
95 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju 7030
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus 7030 and Samsung TL320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 7030 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 7030 was announced 11 months after the TL320 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 7030 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 7030 scores vs the TL320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 7030 & Samsung TL320. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 7030 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 7030 over the Samsung TL320
| 7030 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Olympus 7030
| TL320 | 7030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 7030 and Samsung TL320
| 7030 | TL320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 7030 has outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus 7030 and Samsung TL320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the 7030 vs the TL320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 7030 and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 7030 and TL320.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus 7030 to show extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher 7030 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 7030 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung TL320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 7030 | Samsung TL320 |
| Other name | mju 7030 | WB1000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 and 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 140g (0.31 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $179 | $380 |
