Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus SH-2 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-2 was released 14 months after the WG-4 GPS making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SH-2 matches up against the WG-4 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
SH-2 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2015 | February 2014 | Newer by 14 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus SH-2
WG-4 GPS | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
SH-2 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 has got exterior dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-2 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-2 compared to the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and WG-4 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-2 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical megapixels so you should expect similar quality of files though you should really factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent SH-2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-03-11 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $399 | $210 |