Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-3 was released 3 years later than the EX2F and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the SH-3 grades vs the EX2F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Samsung EX2F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung EX2F
| SH-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | December 2012 | Fresher by 39 months | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus SH-3
| EX2F | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung EX2F
| SH-3 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the SH-3 against the EX2F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and EX2F is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-3 and EX2F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SH-3 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus SH-3 will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern SH-3 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.5 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 294g (0.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $579 | $478 |