Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung SL202, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-3 was manufactured 7 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the SH-3 matches up vs the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Samsung SL202
| SH-3 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 85 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus SH-3
| SL202 | SH-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Samsung SL202
| SH-3 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-3 has exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus SH-3 versus Samsung SL202 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-3 versus the SL202.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-3 and SL202 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-3 and SL202.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SH-3 to provide greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent SH-3 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-3 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-02-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.5 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $579 | $140 |
