Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
69 Imaging
38 Features
29 Overall
34
82 Imaging
56 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-820UZ
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Launched February 2012
- Updated by Sigma DP2 Merrill
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the SP-820UZ (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the SP-820UZ (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-820UZ was unveiled 7 months later than the DP1 Merrill so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SP-820UZ being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SP-820UZ matches up versus the DP1 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ & Sigma DP1 Merrill. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery & Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
SP-820UZ | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | February 2012 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus SP-820UZ
DP1 Merrill | SP-820UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-820UZ and Sigma DP1 Merrill
SP-820UZ | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-820UZ offers outer measurements of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-820UZ versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-820UZ against the DP1 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-820UZ and DP1 Merrill is 69 and 82 respectively.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SP-820UZ and DP1 Merrill.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SP-820UZ with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will produce greater detail having an extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger SP-820UZ should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-820UZ vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 22-896mm (40.7x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.4-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 15.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 485 gr (1.07 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $299 | $1,250 |