Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
59 Imaging
43 Features
45 Overall
43
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Launched February 2010
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD14
Photography Glossary Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was introduced at a similar time to the SD15 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the 6020 grades vs the SD15 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Sigma SD15. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Sigma SD15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Sigma SD15
| 6020 | SD15 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Olympus 6020
| SD15 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Sigma SD15
| 6020 | SD15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD15 has specifications of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the 6020 and the SD15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and SD15 is 95 and 59 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and SD15.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 6020 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus 6020 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 6020 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma SD15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Sigma SD15 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 750 grams (1.65 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $279 | $1,500 |