Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is PL70
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL720, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the SL720 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 2 years after the SL720 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL720 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the SL720 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung SL720. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung SL720
TG-820 iHS | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 32 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Sharper screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
SL720 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL720
TG-820 iHS | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL720 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung SL720 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the SL720.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and SL720 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-820 iHS and SL720.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you have to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent TG-820 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung SL720 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung SL720 |
Also called | - | PL70 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2009-07-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $119 |