Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The VG-160 was announced 2 years after the CX1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-160 grades against the CX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh CX1

 VG-160 CX1 
LaunchedJanuary 2012February 2009Newer by 36 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VG-160

 CX1 VG-160 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh CX1

 VG-160 CX1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Check the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 and the CX1.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The picture below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and CX1.

As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to offer you greater detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer VG-160 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
25
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than others (125 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography factors
26
good megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (165 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
Travel photography with Ricoh CX1
65
lighter than others (125g)
good megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (165 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
59
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-160
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX1
36
quite wide (26mm)
screen is a good size (3")
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery power (165 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
30
quite wide (26mm)
features face detection focus
lighter than others (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic jack
28
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus VG-160Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-160 Ricoh CX1
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-01-10 2009-02-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 180 grams (0.40 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $90 $299