Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a detailed overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe VR-320 was revealed 2 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the VR-320 matches up vs the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung SL202
VR-320 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus VR-320
SL202 | VR-320 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung SL202
VR-320 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 and the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and SL202 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and SL202.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to result in greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung SL202 |
Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $179 | $140 |