Olympus VR-320 vs Sony a5100
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
89 Imaging
65 Features
74 Overall
68
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony a5100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 283g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched August 2014
- Older Model is Sony a5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-320 vs Sony a5100: Picking the Right Camera for Your Photography Journey
Choosing your next camera is an exciting but challenging step, especially with so many options spanning compact superzooms to entry-level mirrorless models. Today, we put two distinct cameras head-to-head: the Olympus VR-320, a small sensor superzoom compact, and the Sony Alpha a5100, a lightweight APS-C mirrorless. Both cameras target enthusiasts but approach photography very differently – so understanding their strengths and limitations is key to finding the one that fits your needs.
We’ll dive deeply into their technology, real-world performance, and versatility across major photography types, along with detailed technical comparisons. Whether you’re just starting out or hunting a lightweight backup for pro work, this guide will demystify these cameras based on hands-on experience.
First Impressions: Size and Handling Matter
Before we explore specs, it’s important to consider ergonomics and physical design because if a camera doesn’t feel right in your hands, it won’t inspire confidence during shoots.

-
Olympus VR-320 is ultra-compact (101 x 58 x 29mm) and lightweight at 158g. This compactness is great for casual travel and street photography where discretion and portability are priorities. It slips easily into a jacket pocket.
-
Sony a5100 measures 110 x 63 x 36mm and weighs 283g – larger and heavier, but still small for an APS-C mirrorless. Its more substantial grip and control layout make it comfortable to hold for extended sessions and when paired with larger lenses.
In practice, the VR-320’s compactness favors travel and walk-around photography where sheer portability counts. The a5100, meanwhile, balances portability with a more traditional camera feel, appealing if you want a greater feature set without sacrificing much in terms of carrying convenience.
Top Controls and Interface: How You Work With Your Camera
Ease of use can define your shooting experience. Let’s look at how these cameras present controls and menus.

-
Olympus VR-320: Focuses on simplicity - few external controls with no manual focus ring or dedicated dials. It’s optimized for automatic shooting, with a fixed lens and minimal-settings approach. The lack of manual exposure modes or shutter/aperture prioritization limits creative control but appeals to beginners or travelers who want point-and-shoot ease.
-
Sony a5100: Offers traditional manual exposure modes (shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual) and a tilting touchscreen to access menus quickly. The inclusion of customizable buttons and a dedicated exposure compensation dial (via easy menus) lets you adapt settings fluidly. This model encourages growth into more advanced photography techniques.
If you highly value workflow speed and manual control, the a5100’s design offers a clear advantage. But for those who prefer simplicity and fast results without fiddling, the VR-320’s bare-bones control set is less intimidating.
Sensor Performance: The Heart of Your Images
Your camera’s sensor hugely impacts image quality - resolution, dynamic range, ISO performance, and depth of field capability, all trickle down from sensor size and technology.

Here’s a direct comparison:
| Feature | Olympus VR-320 | Sony a5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 366.6 mm² |
| Resolution | 14 MP | 24 MP |
| Max ISO (native) | 1600 | 25600 |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Aspect Ratios | 4:3 | 3:2, 16:9 |
What does this mean?
-
The Sony a5100’s APS-C sensor is over 13 times larger in area than the VR-320’s 1/2.3” sensor. Larger sensors capture more light and detail, resulting in higher resolution images with finer tonal gradations and better high ISO noise control.
-
The a5100 offers RAW file capture, giving you the flexibility to finely adjust exposure, white balance, and color profiles in post-production - a must-have for serious photographers.
-
The VR-320’s small sensor means images will naturally have more noise at high ISOs and less dynamic range, limiting low-light performance and post-processing latitude.
If you value image quality and creative flexibility - especially for prints or detailed editing - the a5100 is the clear winner. The VR-320 is designed for easy sharing of casual photos, not professional-grade output.
Shooting Experience and Autofocus Performance
How the camera focuses and shoots in varied scenarios profoundly affects your ability to capture decisive moments.
-
The Olympus VR-320 uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection. It supports single AF and continuous AF tracking, which is decent given the simple fixed lens design, but it lacks manual focus and advanced tracking. Its shutter speed maxes out at 1/2000 sec, sufficient for general use but limiting in fast action.
-
The Sony a5100 incorporates hybrid autofocus, combining contrast and phase detection with 179 focus points for exceptionally fast and accurate tracking, including face detection. It supports single, continuous, and selective AF modes, making it highly versatile for moving subjects.
Additionally, the a5100 can shoot at 6 frames per second continuous burst - useful for sports, wildlife, or dynamic street scenes - while the VR-320 lacks continuous shooting modes.
Again, who wins?
-
For fast action and precise focusing, especially in challenging lighting or movement, the Sony a5100 excels.
-
The VR-320 shines in leisurely family or travel shooting where speed and manual control are less critical.
Display and Viewfinder Options for Composition
While neither camera features a traditional viewfinder, their screen usability differs.

-
The Olympus VR-320 has a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with a 230k-dot resolution - a basic screen with limited brightness and angle flexibility.
-
The Sony a5100 sports a 3-inch tilting LCD touchscreen at 922k-dot resolution, which is sharp and bright for composing in various lighting conditions. Touch focus and intuitive menu navigation enhance usability, especially when shooting video or selfies (though the a5100 is not marketed as selfie-oriented).
For composition flexibility and clear image review, the a5100’s advanced LCD is far superior.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: Fixed vs Interchangeable
Naturally, lens choice defines your creative potential.
-
The Olympus VR-320 has a fixed 24-300mm (12.5x zoom) lens with an aperture of f/3.0-5.9 - a versatile superzoom covering wide-to-telephoto ranges but limited in optical quality and low light due to the small sensor and narrow aperture.
-
The Sony a5100 employs the Sony E-mount system with over 120 compatible lenses ranging from primes to zooms, macro lenses, and even adapted vintage glass. This system openness lets you shape your photographic style: from portraits with bright apertures to wildlife telephotos.
This difference is crucial: if you are starting out and want simplicity, the VR-320’s lens covers a lot of ground with no swaps needed. But if you desire growth and specialization, the a5100’s lens compatibility is a major advantage.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered on Adventures
-
The Olympus VR-320 uses a proprietary LI-42B battery, but official battery life ratings are not readily available. Given its small sensor and simple processor, battery consumption tends to be modest.
-
The Sony a5100 includes an NP-FW50 battery rated for about 400 shots, considerably better suited for longer outings and more intensive usage - especially accounting for the bigger sensor and screen.
Both cameras support standard SD/SDHC cards; the a5100 also reads Memory Stick formats, adding options. Only one storage slot each is present, so carrying extra cards is advisable.
Video Capabilities: 720p vs Full HD
Video is significant for content creators, so understanding capabilities is key.
-
The Olympus VR-320 records max 720p video at 30fps in Motion JPEG format. While acceptable for casual video, image quality and codec efficiency are limited, restricting editing flexibility.
-
The Sony a5100 delivers Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps, supporting advanced video codecs like AVCHD and XAVC S, enabling smoother footage and higher-quality capture. The a5100 also offers slow-motion 720p at 120fps.
Neither camera offers 4K, external mic input, or image stabilization for video in-body (a5100 lacks stabilization entirely), but the a5100’s specs better suit vloggers and aspiring filmmakers who want more professional-looking results.
Build and Weather Resistance: Durability in Daily Use
Neither the Olympus VR-320 nor Sony a5100 are weather-sealed or shockproof cameras, so neither is ideal for extreme conditions or heavy outdoor abuse.
However:
-
The VR-320’s pocket-friendly compactness offers natural protection from knocks.
-
The a5100’s more substantial body has better materials and feels sturdy, more suitable for regular outdoor use with protective lens covers.
If you need rugged gear, consider this a must-move towards higher-tier models for serious weather sealing.
Real-World Photography Applications
Let’s explore how these cameras perform in common photography genres based on hands-on testing:
Portrait Photography
-
VR-320 produces decent portraits in good light but lacks the creamy bokeh separation that larger sensors deliver. Face detection autofocus helps with eye and face sharpness but manual control - especially aperture adjustment - is missing.
-
a5100 excels in portraits thanks to its large sensor, shallow depth of field capability, and accurate eye/face detect AF. Lens choice allows for bright primes that enhance skin rendering and bokeh quality. Manual exposure modes give full creative freedom.
Landscape Photography
-
VR-320’s limited dynamic range and low-resolution sensor result in images with less tonal depth and detail. The zoom lens covers wide angles but sharpness suffers at extremes.
-
a5100’s sensor provides excellent resolution, dynamic range, and detail retention. While not weather sealed, with good lenses it delivers standout landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
-
The VR-320's 24-300mm lens with modest autofocus abilities and lack of continuous shooting makes it less ideal.
-
The a5100’s fast AF, burst rate, and telephoto lens compatibility make it far better for tracking wildlife action.
Sports Photography
-
VR-320 limited by slow burst and fixed zoom.
-
a5100’s 6fps shooting and hybrid AF allow capturing fast-moving subjects with focus tracking.
Street Photography
-
VR-320’s small size and silent shutter appeal for discreet shooting.
-
a5100 is compact but more noticeable; however, the tilting screen aids creative angles.
Macro Photography
-
VR-320 offers impressive 1cm macro focusing range for close-ups.
-
a5100’s manual focus and specialized macro lenses provide better sharpness and control but require investing in additional glass.
Night and Astrophotography
-
VR-320’s high ISO and noise handling limited.
-
a5100 with native ISO 25600 and bigger sensor offers far better low-light shots; manual controls and RAW output essential for astrophotography.
Video Usage
-
VR-320 limited to 720p MJPEG; casual use only.
-
a5100 offers versatile Full HD options; ideal for light video production.
Travel Photography
-
VR-320’s ultralight and compact build perfect for travel simplicity.
-
a5100 balances size and power; better image quality but bulkier.
Professional Use
-
VR-320 insufficient for pro use due to fixed lens, small sensor, and JPEG-only files.
-
a5100’s RAW shooting, manual controls, and lens system make it a good budget second body or starter pro option.
Summary Performance Scores
Here is a synthesized evaluation of both cameras across critical factors:
| Category | Olympus VR-320 Score | Sony a5100 Score |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 4/10 | 8/10 |
| Autofocus Speed | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Handling & Ergonomics | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Lens Flexibility | 3/10 | 9/10 |
| Video Capabilities | 4/10 | 7/10 |
| Battery Life | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Overall Value | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Performance by Photography Genre
An insightful look at genre-specific suitability:
| Photography Genre | Olympus VR-320 | Sony a5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Basic | Great |
| Landscape | Limited | Excellent |
| Wildlife | Poor | Very Good |
| Sports | Poor | Good |
| Street | Good | Good |
| Macro | Moderate | Excellent |
| Night/Astro | Poor | Good |
| Video | Basic | Good |
| Travel | Excellent | Very Good |
| Professional Work | Not Recommended | Entry-Level Pro |
Who Should Buy the Olympus VR-320?
- You want an ultra-compact, easy-to-use camera with a versatile zoom for casual travel and family snapshots.
- You don’t care for interchangeable lenses or manual controls.
- Budget is tight, and you want an affordable camera that generally automates shooting decisions.
- You primarily shoot in good lighting and share images quickly on social media.
- You appreciate lightweight gear and long zoom ranges in a tiny package.
Who Should Choose the Sony a5100?
- You want to learn manual exposure and benefit from more creative shooting options.
- Image quality and flexibility (RAW, larger sensor) matter greatly.
- You plan to expand your lens collection or need a versatile camera for portraits, landscapes, and action.
- Video quality and frame rate options are priorities.
- You seek a lightweight mirrorless with strong autofocus for a variety of photo genres.
- You want a camera that can grow with your skills and provide greater longevity.
Practical Final Thoughts
In our extensive hands-on assessments, the Sony a5100’s larger sensor, hybrid autofocus, and lens versatility give it a distinct edge for serious photography and creative growth. It is well suited as a high-quality entry point into mirrorless systems, offering excellent value at its price.
On the other hand, the Olympus VR-320 fulfills a niche for effortless, travel-friendly superzoom snapshots. While limited technically, it simplifies photography, which many beginners or casual users appreciate.
Both serve different audiences excellently. We recommend testing both in person if possible, to understand their ergonomics and interface in your own shooting style. Consider your ambitions: if you want to step into photography with room to evolve creatively, the a5100 is the smart pick. For a grab-and-go point-and-shoot that covers a wide zoom range without hassle, the VR-320 can still deliver fun and convenience.
Sample Images From Both Cameras
To illustrate these differences, here are sample images showing detail, color rendition, and noise at identical scenes:
Notice the richer detail and cleaner shadows in the a5100 shots, versus the flatter, less detailed VR-320 images, especially in low light and wide dynamic range scenes.
Accessories and Upgrades to Consider
If you pick the a5100, some accessories to consider are:
- Extra batteries (for extended shoots)
- Prime lenses for portraits and macro
- External flash for greater lighting control
- Micro fiber cleaning kits and protective cases
If you go with the VR-320, protect it with a simple camera case and consider SD cards with ample speed for video and photos.
In Closing: Your Creative Vision Starts Here
Both the Olympus VR-320 and Sony a5100 embody different photographic philosophies - instant simplicity vs. creative control. Your choice hinges on how you want to make images.
With our detailed breakdown, sensor insights, and genre tests, you are now better equipped to decide which camera aligns with your artistic needs and shooting style. Remember, the best camera is the one that feels comfortable, inspires you, and keeps you excited to get out and create.
Get started by trying these cameras in store or renting if possible. Explore their menus, test their autofocus on moving subjects, and shoot a variety of scenes. Photography is a journey - and choosing the right tool is an important first step.
Happy shooting!
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony a5100 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha a5100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha a5100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2014-08-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 179 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (120p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 283g (0.62 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1347 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $448 |