Clicky

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
57
Features
33
Overall
47

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Launched January 2013
  • Old Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview

Below, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is fairly close but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The XZ-2 iHS was released within a month of the DP3 Merrill and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS scores versus the DP3 Merrill in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sigma DP3 Merrill

 XZ-2 iHS DP3 Merrill 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 DP3 Merrill XZ-2 iHS 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma DP3 Merrill

 XZ-2 iHS DP3 Merrill 
LaunchedDecember 2012January 2013Same generation
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Display resolution920k920kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features exterior measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS vs the DP3 Merrill.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and DP3 Merrill is 85 and 83 respectively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and DP3 Merrill.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will result in more detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Portrait photography camera
46
focusing manually
offers face detect focus
supports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
74
you can focus manually
MP count good (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
Sigma DP3 Merrill Street photography advice
66
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competition in class (346g)
65
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography highlights
Sigma DP3 Merrill Sports photography highlights
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
great battery pack (340 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
45
MP count good (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (75mm)
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Travel photography camera
61
great battery pack (340 shots)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
low MP (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
54
MP count good (15 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
55
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 CIPA)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lack of Time Lapse function
56
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
MP count good (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (75mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging features
Sigma DP3 Merrill Vlogging features
36
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have mic support
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (346 grams)
22
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Olympus XZ-2 iHSSigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sigma DP3 Merrill
Class Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2012-12-18 2013-01-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4704 x 3136
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 75mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 920k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s -
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s -
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.60 m (ISO 800) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 346g (0.76 lb) 330g (0.73 lb)
Dimensions 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 216 not tested
Other
Battery life 340 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $450 $1,353