Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Bump to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh GR, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and GR (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FS42 was manufactured 5 years before the GR which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the FS42 matches up versus the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are provided at Panasonic FS42 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Ricoh GR
FS42 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Panasonic FS42
GR | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2013 | April 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Ricoh GR
FS42 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Panasonic FS42 has physical measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has sizing of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Panasonic FS42 versus Ricoh GR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the FS42 and the GR.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the FS42 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FS42 and GR.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The FS42 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GR will give greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged FS42 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FS42 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-04-17 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 300 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $580 | $971 |