Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the FS42 (10MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the FS42 (1/2.5") and MV800 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe FS42 was released 3 years earlier than the MV800 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the FS42 matches up vs the MV800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are viewable at Panasonic FS42 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Samsung MV800
FS42 | MV800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Panasonic FS42
MV800 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | April 2009 | More recent by 28 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FS42 and Samsung MV800
FS42 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FS42 has got physical dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the FS42 against the MV800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FS42 and MV800 is 95 and 97 respectively.
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the FS42 and MV800.
To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The FS42 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung MV800 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The older FS42 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FS42 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | Samsung MV800 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-04-17 | 2011-09-01 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 33-132mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.30 m | 3.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Micro SD |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $580 | $499 |