Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Panasonic and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the FX700 (14MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the FX700 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe FX700 was brought out 7 years after the SD9 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the FX700 scores vs the SD9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Panasonic FX700 Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Sigma SD9
FX700 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | November 2002 | More modern by 94 months | |
Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Panasonic FX700
SD9 | FX700 |
---|
Common features in the Panasonic FX700 and Sigma SD9
FX700 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FX700 has got external measurements of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
See the Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the FX700 against the SD9.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the FX700 and SD9 is 94 and 54 respectively.
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FX700 and SD9.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FX700 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Panasonic FX700 will offer extra detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent FX700 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FX700 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sigma |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 130k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.40 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | AVCHD | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $399 | $3,001 |